<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">nid</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Нефрология и диализ</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Nephrology and Dialysis</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1680-4422</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2618-9801</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Российское диализное общество</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">nid-1540</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Сандиммун-Неорал и генерические препараты циклоспорина; проблема взаимозаменяемости</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Pharmacokinetic characteristics and clinical efficacy of generic cyclosporine formulations compared to Sandimmune Neoral</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Столяревич</surname><given-names>Е. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Stoliarevich</surname><given-names>E. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="ru" id="aff-1"><institution>ГУ НИИ трансплантологии и искусственных органов МЗ РФ, г. Москва</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2006</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>06</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>141</fpage><lpage>146</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Столяревич Е.С., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Столяревич Е.С.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Stoliarevich E.S.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.nephro.ru/jour/article/view/1540">https://journal.nephro.ru/jour/article/view/1540</self-uri><abstract><p>Целью настоящего исследования было сравнение биодоступности препаратов-генериков и оригинальнго препарата СуА (Сандиммун Неорал), а также исследование клинической эффективности и частоты побочных эффектов при использовании препаратов-генериков. Материалы и методы: Было выполнено 159 полных фармакокинетических исследований у 115 пациентов после АТП (71 после приема Неорала и 88 на фоне приема препаратов-генериков), с определением концентрации СуА до приема, через 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 и 10 часов после приема СуА. Для оценки клинической эффективности препаратов СуА были проанализированы отдаленные результаты наблюдения у 500 реципиентов аллогенной почки. Длительность наблюдения составляла от 1 до 44 мес. (в среднем 29 ± 13 мес.). Оценивалась частота острого отторжения и хронической трансплантационной нефропатии (ХТН), а также 3-летняя выживаемость трансплантата. Результаты исследования: При сопоставимых значениях С0, основные фармакокинетические параметры такие как Смax и AUC оказались значимо ниже при приеме генериков, чем при использовании оригинального препарата (824 vs 931 нг/мл и 3984 vs. 4292 нг/мл/ч. соответственно). У пациентов, получавших препараты-генерики частота кризов отторжения (10,6%), так же как и вероятность развития ХТН (24%) была значимо более высокой по сравнению с таковой у пациентов, получавших Сандиммун-Неорал (4,1 и 14% соответственно); 3- летняя выживаемость трансплантатов составила 90% у получавших препараты-генерики и 96% у пациентов, получавших Сандиммун-Неорал. Таким образом, данные нашего исследования продемонстрировали значительные различия между препаратами генериками и Сандиммуном Неоралом как по важнейшим фармакокинетическим параметрам (Cmax, Tmax, AUC) так и по клинической эффективности.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The current study was aimed at investigation of pharmacokinetic parameters and of clinical efficacy of generic cyclosporine in comparison with Sandimmune Neoral. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of different cyclosporine formulations, 159 comprehensive pharmacokinetic investigations were accomplished in 115 kidney transplant patients. 71 (45%) out of 159 pharmacokinetic studies were performed in patients treated with Neoral, whereas in 88/159 (55%) cases participants received generic cyclosporine. AUC calculations based on dosing interval concentration values were fulfilled using linear trapezoidal rule. Clinical efficacy of generic cyclosporine was evaluated in a retrospective study of 500 recipients that had undertaken cadaver kidney grafting since 2002 year. 304 participants were treated with Neoral and the other 196 - with generics (mainly Consupren) at least for 3 months. The prevalence of late acute rejection and of chronic allograft dysfunction was analyzed during the mean follow-up period of 29 ± 13 months. The 3-years graft survival rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meyer method. At 100-200 ng/ml maintenance concentration (estimated by C0 concentration) the generic formulation was shown to yield significantly lower Cmax (824 vs 931 ng/ml respectively; p &lt; 0,01) and AUC (3984 vs 4292 ng/ml/h respectively; p &lt; 0,01). Acute rejection (biopsy-proven) rate proved considerably higher in generic Cy-A than in Neoral group (10,6% vs 4,1% respectively; p &lt; 0,05). Chronic allograft dysfunction occurred in 14% of patients subjected to Neoral immunosuppression and in 24% of generic Cy-A recipients (p &lt; 0,05). 3-years graft survival equaled 90 and 96% in generic Cy-A and Neoral groups, respectively (p = 0,05). Conclusion: Pharmacokinetic studies have shown the absorption profile of generic formulations to differ significantly from that of Neoral. Retrospective trial demonstrated higher acute rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction rates as well as lower 3-years graft survival in patients treated with generics and compared to Neoral group participants.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>трансплантация органов</kwd><kwd>Сандиммун-Неорал и генерические препараты циклоспорина</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Данович Г.М. Руководство по трансплантации почки Пер. с англ. под ред. Я.Г. Мойсюк 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Данович Г.М. Руководство по трансплантации почки Пер. с англ. под ред. Я.Г. Мойсюк 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Столяревич Е.С, Суханов А.В., Багдасарян А.Р., Томилина Н.А. К вопросу об оптимизации мониторинга терапии препаратами циклоспорина в поздние сроки после аллотрансплантации почки. Нефрология и диализ 2004; 6; 2: 145-154.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Столяревич Е.С, Суханов А.В., Багдасарян А.Р., Томилина Н.А. К вопросу об оптимизации мониторинга терапии препаратами циклоспорина в поздние сроки после аллотрансплантации почки. Нефрология и диализ 2004; 6; 2: 145-154.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Суханов А.В., Столяревич Е.С., Котенко О.Н.,Федорова Н.Д., Томилина Н.А. и др. Хроническая нефротоксичность циклоспорина А: функционально-морфологическая характеристика и клинические проявления в поздние сроки после трансплантации почки. Нефрология и диализ 2004; 6; 2: 170-177.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Суханов А.В., Столяревич Е.С., Котенко О.Н.,Федорова Н.Д., Томилина Н.А. и др. Хроническая нефротоксичность циклоспорина А: функционально-морфологическая характеристика и клинические проявления в поздние сроки после трансплантации почки. Нефрология и диализ 2004; 6; 2: 170-177.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Трансплантология. Руководство. Под ред. В.И. Шумакова. М.: Медицина 1995.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Трансплантология. Руководство. Под ред. В.И. Шумакова. М.: Медицина 1995.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шумаков В.И., Мойсюк Я.Г., Томилина Н.А. и др. Трансплантация почки. Нефрология, руководство под редакцией Тареевой И.Е. М.: Медицина 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Шумаков В.И., Мойсюк Я.Г., Томилина Н.А. и др. Трансплантация почки. Нефрология, руководство под редакцией Тареевой И.Е. М.: Медицина 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cattaneo D., Perico N., Remuzzi G. Generic cyclosporine formulation: more open questions than answers Transplant International 2005; 18: 371-378.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cattaneo D., Perico N., Remuzzi G. Generic cyclosporine formulation: more open questions than answers Transplant International 2005; 18: 371-378.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">CTS Collaborative study. Newsletter 1: 2001. www.ctstransplant.org</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">CTS Collaborative study. Newsletter 1: 2001. www.ctstransplant.org</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gaspari F., Anedda M.F., Signorini O. et al. Prediction of cyclosporine area under the curve using a three-point sampling strategy after Neoral administration. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8(4): 647-52.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gaspari F., Anedda M.F., Signorini O. et al. Prediction of cyclosporine area under the curve using a three-point sampling strategy after Neoral administration. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8(4): 647-52.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Johnston A., Belitsky P., Frey U. Potential clinical implication of substitution of generic cyclosporine formulations for cyclosporine (Neoral) in transplant recipients. European Journal of clinical pharmacology; 60(6): 389-395.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Johnston A., Belitsky P., Frey U. Potential clinical implication of substitution of generic cyclosporine formulations for cyclosporine (Neoral) in transplant recipients. European Journal of clinical pharmacology; 60(6): 389-395.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kahan B.D., Ponticelli C. Principles and practice of Renal Transplantation 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kahan B.D., Ponticelli C. Principles and practice of Renal Transplantation 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kahan B.D.,Welsh M., Rutzky I.P. Challenges in Cyclosporine therapy: The role of therapeutic monitoring by area under the curve monitoring. Ther Drug Monit 1995; 17: 621-624.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kahan B.D.,Welsh M., Rutzky I.P. Challenges in Cyclosporine therapy: The role of therapeutic monitoring by area under the curve monitoring. Ther Drug Monit 1995; 17: 621-624.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kahan B.D. Consideration concerning generic formulation of immunosuppressive drugs. Transplant Proc 1999; 31: 1635.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kahan B.D. Consideration concerning generic formulation of immunosuppressive drugs. Transplant Proc 1999; 31: 1635.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kahan B.D., Welsh M., Urbauer D.L. Low Intraindividual Variability of Cyclosporin A Exposure Reduces Chronic Rejection Incidence and Health Care Costs Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11: 1122-1131.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kahan B.D., Welsh M., Urbauer D.L. Low Intraindividual Variability of Cyclosporin A Exposure Reduces Chronic Rejection Incidence and Health Care Costs Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11: 1122-1131.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mahalati K., Belitsky P., Sketris I. et al. Neoral monitoring by simplified sparse sampling area under the concentration-time curve: its relationship to acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity early after kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1999; 68; 1: 55-62.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mahalati K., Belitsky P., Sketris I. et al. Neoral monitoring by simplified sparse sampling area under the concentration-time curve: its relationship to acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity early after kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1999; 68; 1: 55-62.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mahalati K., Belitsky P., West K. et al. Approaching the therapeutic window for Cyclosporine in kidney transplantation: a prospective study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 828-833.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mahalati K., Belitsky P., West K. et al. Approaching the therapeutic window for Cyclosporine in kidney transplantation: a prospective study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 828-833.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mahalati K., Kahan B.D. Pharmacological surrogates of allograft outcome. Ann Transplant 2000; 5; 2: 14-23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mahalati K., Kahan B.D. Pharmacological surrogates of allograft outcome. Ann Transplant 2000; 5; 2: 14-23.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Masri M.A., Barbari A., Stephan A. Pharmacokinetics in stable renal transplant patients: effect of formulation sandimmun versus consupren versus neural. Transplant Proc 1996; 28: 1318-1320.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Masri M.A., Barbari A., Stephan A. Pharmacokinetics in stable renal transplant patients: effect of formulation sandimmun versus consupren versus neural. Transplant Proc 1996; 28: 1318-1320.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mihatsch M.J., Morozumi K., Strom E.H., Ryffel B., Gudat T., Theil G. Renal transplant morphology after long-term therapy with cyclosporine. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mihatsch M.J., Morozumi K., Strom E.H., Ryffel B., Gudat T., Theil G. Renal transplant morphology after long-term therapy with cyclosporine. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 39.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Noble S., Markham A. Cyclosporin: а reviеw of its pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of microemulsion-based formulation (Neoral). Drugs 1995; 50: 924-941.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Noble S., Markham A. Cyclosporin: а reviеw of its pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of microemulsion-based formulation (Neoral). Drugs 1995; 50: 924-941.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pollard S., Nashan B., Johnston A. A Pharmacokinetic and clinical review of the potential clinical impact of using different formulations of Cyclosporin A. Clinical Therapeutics 2003; 25; 6: 1654-1664.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pollard S., Nashan B., Johnston A. A Pharmacokinetic and clinical review of the potential clinical impact of using different formulations of Cyclosporin A. Clinical Therapeutics 2003; 25; 6: 1654-1664.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Racusen L.C., Solez K., Colvin R.B., Bonsib S.M. et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int 1999; 55(2): 713-723.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Racusen L.C., Solez K., Colvin R.B., Bonsib S.M. et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int 1999; 55(2): 713-723.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
