Preview

Nephrology and Dialysis

Advanced search

Predictors of results of endovascular correction of renal artery stenosis

https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2020-1-99-107

Abstract

Relevance: endovascular correction of renal artery stenosis (ECRAS) is currently insufficiently implemented in clinical practice due to the lack of uniform indications and contraindications for intervention and patient management protocols. Today, prediction of the results of ECRAS are also not well understood. Objective: to identify significant predictors of outcomes of endovascular correction of hemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis using methods of univariate and multivariate analysis. Materials and methods: ECRAS results were analyzed in 167 patients (62.93±0.69 years old, from 25 to 82 years old, 44.9% men) who underwent 205 interventions. The observation time was 29.15±1.62 months. Using the methods of univariate (Kaplan-Meier) and multivariate analysis (Cox-regression), the effect of various prognostic factors on the survival of the renal artery (RA) was studied. RA survival was understood as maintaining its patency. The cessation of patency of the RA was observed in the event of hemodynamically significant restenosis or occlusion of the RA. Results and conclusions: patient survival rate after ECRAS was: 1-year-old - 99%, 3- and 5-year-old - 93%, and RA survival: 92%, 90%, and 79%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, significant (p<0.05) predictors of ECRAS results before the intervention were age (over 70 years), multifocal atherosclerosis, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD), a single functioning kidney; on the third day after the intervention - blood pressure (BP) control group; after 1 month - GFR; after 12 months - GFR, stage of CKD, control group and average blood pressure, number of antihypertensive drugs (AHD). According to multivariate analysis, the significant independent predictors of ECRAS results before the intervention were: the CKD stage and a single functioning kidney, and after 12 months - a single functioning kidney and the number of AHD.

About the Authors

D. Y. Popov
Department of Nursing Management, Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation


I. F. Yumanova
Department of Computational Mathematics and Computer Science, B.N. Yeltsin Ural Federal University
Russian Federation


A. G. Stolyar
Department of Nephrology, Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital No 1
Russian Federation


References

1. Шилов Е.М., Смирнов А.В., Козловская Н.Л. Нефрология. Клинические рекомендации. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2016.

2. Weber B., Dieter R. Renal artery stenosis: epidemiology and treatment. Int. J. Nephrol. Renovasc. Dis. 2014; 7: 169-181. DOI: 10.2147/IJNRD.S40175

3. Hirsch A.T., Haskal Z.J., Hertzer N.R. et al. ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): executive summary a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006; 47(6): 1239-1312. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.009

4. Henry M., Henry I., Klonaris C. et al. Renal angioplasty and stenting under protection: the way for the future? Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2003; 60(3): 299-312. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10669

5. Harding M., Smith L., Himmelstein S. et al. Renal artery stenosis: prevalence and associated risk factors in patients undergoing routine cardiac catheterization. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1992; 2(11): 1608-1616.

6. Клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению реноваскулярной гипертензии и ишемической болезни почек. Научное общество нефрологов России, 2015.

7. Aboyans V., Ricco J.B., Bartelink M.E.L. et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries. Endorsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO), The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur. Heart J. 2018; 39(9): 763-816. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095

8. Шарафеев А.З., Халирахманов А.Ф., Харисова Э.Х. Сложности принятия решения о реваскуляризации почечных артерий. Практическая медицина. 2016;4(96):187-190.

9. Wheatley K., Ives N., Gray R. et al. Revascularization versus Medical Therapy for Renal-Artery Stenosis. The ASTRAL Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009; 361: 1953-1962. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905368

10. Cooper C.J., Murphy T.P., Cutlip D.E. et al. Stenting and Medical Therapy for Atherosclerotic Renal-Artery Stenosis. CORAL Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014; 370: 13-22. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310753

11. Jenks S., Yeoh S.E., Conway B.R. Balloon angioplasty, with and without stenting, versus medical therapy for hypertensive patients with renal artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014; (12):CD002944. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002944.pub2

12. Henry M., Benjelloun A., Henry I. et al. Renal angioplasty and stenting: is it still indicated after ASTRAL and STAR studies? J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 2010; 51(5): 701-20.

13. Siqueira D., Guillaumon A. Long term outcome of renal artery angioplasty with stenting for atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review. J. vasc. bras. 2017; 16(2): 150-161. DOI: 10.1590/1677-5449.010816

14. KGIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. Suppl. (2011). 2012; 2(5): 339. DOI: 10.1038/kisup.2012.48

15. Parikh S.A., Shishehbor M.H., Gray B.H. et al. SCAI expert consensus statement for renal artery stenting appropriate use. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2014; 84(7): 1163-1171. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25559

16. Levey A.S., Stevens L.A., Schmid C.H. et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009; 150(9): 604-612. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006

17. Chalmers J. 1999 WHO-ISH guidelines for the management of hypertension. Med. J. Aust. 1999; 171(9): 458-9.

18. Клинические рекомендации по профилактике, диагностике и лечению контраст-индуцированной нефропатии. Научное общество нефрологов России, 2015.

19. Yoshihara F., Fukuda T., Iwashima Y. Related factors for worsening renal function following percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Clin. Exp. Hypertens., 2015; 37(7): 526-530. DOI: 10.3109/10641963.2015.1013125

20. Simone T., Brooke B., Goodney P. et al. Clinical effectiveness of secondary interventions for restenosis after renal artery stenting. J. Vasc Surg. 2013; 58(3): 687-694. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.03.009

21. Zeller T., Frank U., Muller C. Et al. Predictors of improved renal function after percutaneous stent-supported angioplasty of severe atherosclerotic ostial renal artery stenosis. Circulation. 2003;108:2244-2249. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095786.44712.2A

22. Modrall J.G., Timaran C.H., Rosero E.B. et al. Predictors of outcome for renal artery stenting performed for salvage of renal function. J. Vasc Surg. 2011;54(5):1414-1421.e1; discussion 1420-1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.042


Review

For citations:


Popov D.Y., Yumanova I.F., Stolyar A.G. Predictors of results of endovascular correction of renal artery stenosis. Nephrology and Dialysis. 2020;22(1):99-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2020-1-99-107

Views: 59


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1680-4422 (Print)
ISSN 2618-9801 (Online)