Ultrasound examination of failed renal transplant in patients with graft intolerance syndrome. Case series

Background. The number of kidney transplantations is increasing worldwide. Therefore, the number of patients with a failed renal graft (RG), returning to dialysis is increasing too. The most common indication for transplantectomy (TE) in patients with late dysfunction is graft intolerance syndrome (GIS). GIS is a reactivation of rejection processes in a failed RG amidst the significant reduction or cessation of immunosuppressive therapy (IST). The diagnosis of GIS is based on clinical and laboratory criteria, including fever, flu-like condition, local pain, tumescence in the graft area, hematuria, anemia, and increased markers of systemic inflammatory response in the absence of a concomitant infectious process. The question of Doppler ultrasound characteristics of GIS remains open. Materials and Methods. A clinical case series of 7 patients (age 25-51 y) with signs and symptoms of GIS is presented (2019-2022 y). At the time of inclusion in the study, all patients received maintenance hemodialysis from 6 months to 3 years. The functioning time of RG was from 9 months to 10 years. Two patients underwent repeated kidney transplantation. All patients underwent a comprehensive ultrasound examination including a Doppler ultrasound evaluation of RG. The special features of TE and subsequent pathohistological examination were studied. Results. All patients demonstrated typical clinical and laboratory signs of GIS (Hb from 74 to 116 g/L, (Me (IQR) 94 [81; 102]), CRP from 12 to 84 mg/L, (Me (IQR) 43 [18; 72]). Most patients had a history of humoral rejection and skipped IST. According to Grayscale examination in all cases thickening pseudocapsule, graft contour unevenness and blurriness of renal pyramids were detected. The increased size of the renal graft was found in 6 patients. Color Doppler mapping demonstrated active intraparenchymal blood flow with disturbed angioarchitectonics and perirenal collaterals. Power Doppler provided a wide variety of spectrums, including collateral and stenotic at different vascular levels. TE was performed in all cases. 5 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery (3 - subcapsular extraction). Median blood loss was 300 mL (IQR) [150; 400]. 2 cases of opened TE complicated by graft bed hematomas and one case complicated by surgical infection. Histopathological examination of removed grafts revealed the signs of acute and chronic vascular rejection. In addition, there was marked narrowing of the arteries of medium and small caliber and signs of severe parenchymal ischemia. Conclusion. All patients with failed RG should be given comprehensive US examination, including Doppler. GIS with active vascular component has characteristic Doppler signs. The presence of perirenal collaterals, active blood flow in failed RG, and fibrous pseudocapsule create additional challenges for TE and require a personalized approach to the choice of surgical tactics.

синдром непереносимости аллографта, нефункционирующий почечный трансплантат, ультразвуковое исследование, допплерография, периренальные коллатерали, трансплантатэктомия, иммуносупрессия, Graft Intolerance Syndrome, failed renal transplant, ultrasound examination, Doppler sonography, perirenal collaterals, transplantectomy, immunosuppression

1. Kaballo M.A., Canney M., O’Kelly P. et al. A comparative analysis of survival of patients on dialysis and after kidney transplantation. Clin Kidney J. 2018. 11:389-393. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx117

2. Saran R., Robinson B., Abbott K.C. et al. US Renal Data System 2019 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020. 75(1 Suppl 1):A6-A7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.09.003

3. Kaplan B., Meier-Kriesche H.U. Death after graft loss: an important late study endpoint in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2002. 2(10):970-974. doi:10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.21015.x

4. Woodside K.J., Schirm Z.W., Noon K.A. et al. Fever, infection, and rejection after kidney transplant failure. Transplantation. 2014. 97(6):648-653. doi:10.1097/01.TP.0000437558.75574.9c

5. Bunthof K.L.W., Steenbergen E.J., Hilbrands L.B. Histopathological examination of removed kidney allografts: Is it useful? A retrospective cohort study. Transpl Int. 2020. 33(12):1693-1699. doi:10.1111/tri.13724

6. Davis S., Mohan S. Managing Patients with Failing Kidney Allograft: Many Questions Remain. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022. 17(3):444-451. doi:10.2215/CJN.14620920

7. Ayus J.C., Achinger S.G., Lee S. et al. Transplant nephrectomy improves survival following a failed renal allograft. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010. 21(2):374-380. doi:10.1681/ASN.2009050480

8. Bennett W.M. The failed renal transplant: in or out? Semin Dial. 2005. 18(3):188-189. doi:10.1111/j.1525-139X.2005.18306.x

9. Bunthof K.L.W., Hazzan M., Hilbrands L.B. Review: Management of patients with kidney allograft failure. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2018. 32(3):178-186. doi:10.1016/j.trre.2018.03.001

10. McCaughan J.A., Patterson C.C. et al. Factors influencing survival after kidney transplant failure. Transplant Res. 2014. 3:18. doi:10.1186/2047-1440-3-18

11. Smak Gregoor P.J., Zietse R., van Saase J.L. et al. Immunosuppression should be stopped in patients with renal allograft failure. Clin Transplant. 2001. 15(6):397-401. doi:10.1034/j.1399-0012.2001.150606.x

12. Pham P.T., Everly M., Faravardeh A., Pham P.C. Management of patients with a failed kidney transplant: Dialysis reinitiation, immunosuppression weaning, and transplantectomy. World J Nephrol. 2015. 4(2):148-159. doi:10.5527/wjn.v4.i2.148

13. Kochar G.S., Langone A.J. How Should We Manage Renal Transplant Patients with Failed Allografts Who Return to Dialysis? Blood Purif. 2020. 49(1-2):228-231. doi:10.1159/000505284

14. Augustine J.J., Woodside K.J., Padiyar A. et al. Independent of nephrectomy, weaning immunosuppression leads to late sensitization after kidney transplant failure. Transplantation. 2012. 94(7):738-743. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3182612921

15. Delgado P., Diaz F., Gonzalez A. et al. Intolerance syndrome in failed renal allografts: incidence and efficacy of percutaneous embolization. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005. 46(2):339-44. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.04.024.

16. Antón-Pérez G., Gallego-Samper R., Marrero-Robayna S. et al. Transplantectomy following renal graft failure. Nefrologia. 2012. 32(5):573-578. doi:10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2012.Jun.11100

17. Cofan F., Real M.I., Vilardell J. et al. Percutaneous renal artery embolisation of non-functioning renal allografts with clinical intolerance. Transpl Int. 2002. 15(4):149-155. doi:10.1007/s00147-002-0390-4

18. Madore F., Hébert M.J., Leblanc M. et al. Determinants of late allograft nephrectomy. Clin Nephrol. 1995. 44(5):284-289.

19. Bunthof K.L.W., Verhoeks C.M., van den Brand J.A.J.G., Hilbrands LB. Graft intolerance syndrome requiring graft nephrectomy after late kidney graft failure: can it be predicted? A retrospective cohort study. Transpl Int. 2018. 31(2):220-229. doi:10.1111/tri.13088

20. Артюхина Л.Ю. Подходы к лечению позднего острого и активного хронического отторжения почечного трансплантата. Дисс. на соискание уч. степени канд. мед. наук. 2016. М. 123 с.

21. Singh P., Feld R.I., Colombe B.W. et al. Sensitization, pathologic, and imaging findings comparing symptomatic and quiescent failed renal allografts. Clin Transplant. 2014. 28(12):1424-1432.

22. Torregrosa J.V., Bassa P., Lomeña F.J. et al. The usefulness of 111In-labeled platelet scintigraphy in the diagnosis of patients with febrile syndrome and a nonfunctioning renal graft. Transplantation. 1994. 57(12):1732-1735.

23. Krause I., Cleper R., Belenky A. et al. Graft intolerance syndrome in children with failed kidney allografts--clinical presentation, treatment options and outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008. 23(12):4036-4040. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn362

24. Hirano M., Ohta T., Nakata N. et al. A case of reocclusion of the renal artery diagnosed by the color Doppler method with evaluation of blood flow direction in the collateral circulation of the kidney in addition to the non-detectable blood signal in the renal artery. J Med Ultrason. 2014. 41(4):525-9. doi: 10.1007/s10396-014-0537-9

25. Kim J.K., Han D.J., Cho K.S. Post-infectious diffuse venous stenosis after renal transplantation: duplex ultrasonography and CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2002. 12 Suppl 3:S118-S120. doi:10.1007/s00330-002-1441-z

26. Abrams H.L. Caldwell Lecture. The collateral circulation: response to ischemia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983. 140(6):1051-63. doi: 10.2214/ajr.140.6.1051. PMID: 6344594

27. Secin F.P., Rovegno A.R., del Rosario Brunet M. et al. Cumulative incidence, indications, morbidity and mortality of transplant nephrectomy and the most appropriate time for graft removal: only nonfunctioning transplants that cause intractable complications should be excised. J Urol. 2003. 169(4):1242-1246. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000050658.94353.24

28. Трушкин Р.Н., Артюхина Л.Ю., Щеглов Н.Е. и соавт. Выбор хирургического доступа при удалении нефункционирующего почечного трансплантата. Клиническая нефрология. 2022. 3:72-76. doi: 10.18565/nephrology.2022.3.72-76

29. Garcia-Padilla P.K., Afanador D., Gonzalez C.G. et al. Renal Graft Embolization as a Treatment for Graft Intolerance Syndrome. Transplant Proc. 2020. 52(4):1187-1191. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.051

30. Atar E., Belenky A., Neuman-Levin M. et al. Nonfunctioning renal allograft embolization as an alternative to graft nephrectomy: report on seven years' experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003. 26(1):37-39. doi:10.1007/s00270-002-1976-z

31. Hindi H., Harb A. Role of failed renal allograft embolization in the treatment of graft intolerance syndrome. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2023. 9;13:3. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_109_2022