New possibilities of tunnel catheter implantation for programmed hemodialysis in patients with limited vascular access
https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2025-3-318-328
Abstract
Objective of the study: to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a new method for implanting a tunneled central venous catheter (tCVC) at the confluence of the transverse cervical vein and the external jugular vein in patients undergoing programmed hemodialysis (PHD), compared with the traditional approach of placing the tCVC in the internal jugular vein.
Materials and methods: the study included 164 patients who underwent tCVC implantation for PHD in City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Health Department between August 2022 and December 2024. Group 1 (study group, n=82) comprised patients with occlusion of the internal jugular vein who received tCVC placement at the transverse-external jugular vein confluence. Group 2 (control group, n=82) comprised patients who underwent standard tCVC placement in the internal jugular vein. In both groups, catheter function, incidence and types of complications in the early and late postoperative period, and the feasibility of creating long-term vascular access (AVF) on the side of the previously implanted tCVC were assessed.
Results: Hemodialysis efficiency in patients with tCVC placed with the new technique was comparable to that in the control group. The flow rate (Me [IQR]) through tCVC was 300 [290; 300] ml/min. Blood collection and blood return pressures were 140 [140; 150] mmHg and -140 [-140; -130] mmHg, respectivelyю The Kt/V index was 1.60 [1.40; 1.60] (p=0.329) in the main and control groups. The frequency and types of complications, intraoperative and postoperative, did not differ between groups. AVFs were formed with similar frequency (54.9% in the main group and 53.7% in the control group (p=0.875)), and in most patients the possibility of AVF formation on the same side as the tCVC was preserved.
Conclusion: The proposed alternative method of tCVC placement can be effectively used in patients with limited vascular access for hemodialysis, such as those with the internal jugular vein occlusion. It avoids the need for catheter placement in the subclavian or femoral vein, while maintaining adequate hemodialysis efficiency and safety compared to the standard tCVC technique.
About the Authors
N. L. ShakhovRussian Federation
Nikolay L. Shakhov.
3, Pekhotnaya str., Moscow, 123182
R. N. Trushkin
Russian Federation
Ruslan N. Trushkin.
3, Pekhotnaya str., Moscow, 123182
V. I. Vtorenko
Russian Federation
Vladimir I. Vtorenko.
3, Pekhotnaya str., Moscow, 123182
O. N. Kotenko
Russian Federation
Oleg N. Kotenko.
3, Pekhotnaya str., Moscow, 123182
N. F. Frolova
Russian Federation
Nadiya F. Frolova.
3, Pekhotnaya str., Moscow, 123182
M. Yu. Bogodarov
Russian Federation
Mikhail Y. Bogodarov.
3, Pekhotnaya str., Moscow, 123182
E. S. Kudryavtseva
Russian Federation
Elena S. Kudryavtseva.
3, Pekhotnaya str., Moscow, 123182
D. Z. Tazetdinov
Russian Federation
Damir Z. Tazetdinov.
3, Pekhotnaya str., Moscow, 123182
A. S. Kiselev
Russian Federation
Alexey S. Kiselyov.
3, Pekhotnaya str., Moscow, 123182
A. A. Evdokimova
Russian Federation
Alina A. Evdokimova.
3, Pekhotnaya str., Moscow, 123182
References
1. Lok C.E., Huber T.S. Lee T., et al. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020; 75(4): S1-S164. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.12.001
2. Schröppel B, Bettac L, Schulte-Kemna L et al. Placement of tunnelled haemodialysis catheters-interventional standard. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2025; 40, 264-272. DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfae181
3. Koudounas G, Giannopoulos S, Volteas P et al. Arteriovenous fistula maturation in patients with ipsilateral versus contralateral tunneled dialysis catheter: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 103:14-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.11.048
4. Khudari H, Ozen M, Kowalczyk B et al. Hemodialysis Catheters: Update on Types, Outcomes, Designs and Complications. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2022; 39(1):90-102. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742346.
5. Kanchanasuttirak W, Lekhavat V, Kanchanasuttirak P. Long-Term Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters: Achieving Efficiency Through Tip Position Optimization. Ann Vasc Surg. 2024; 105:158-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.01.018.
6. Beigi A, Sharifi A, Gaheri H et al. Placement of long-term hemodialysis catheter (permcath) in patients with end-stage renal disease through external jugular vein. Advanced Biomedical Research 2024;3(1):252. DOI: 10.4103/2277-9175.146381
7. Wang P, Wang Y, Qiao Y, Zhou S et al. Retrospective Study of Preferable Alternative Route to Right Internal Jugular Vein for Placing Tunneled Dialysis Catheters: Right External Jugular Vein versus Left Internal Jugular Vein. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146411. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146411.
8. Yankovoy A.G., Zulkarnaev A.B. Surgical implantation of a tunnel dialysis catheter into the inferior vena cava. Clinical observation. Nephrology and dialysis. 2023;25(1):111-115. DOI:10.28996/2618-9801-2023-1-111-115
9. Hieu M, Raeeha S, Mohammad A. Inferior Vena Cava Placement of a Transhepatic Tunneled Dialysis Catheter in a Patient with Atypical Hepatic Venous Anatomy: A Case Report. 2024; 16(9):e69365. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69365.
10. Salik E, Daftary A, Tal MG. Three-dimensional anatomy of the left central veins: implications for dialysis catheter placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18:361-364. DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2006.12.721
11. Engstrom BI, Horvath JJ, Stewart JK, et al. Tunneled internal jugular hemodialysis catheters: impact of laterality and tip position on catheter dysfunction and infection rates. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013; 24:1295-1302. DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2013.05.035.
12. Parienti JJ, Thirion M, Mégarbane B, et al. Femoral vs jugular venous catheterization and risk of nosocomial events in adults requiring acute renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008; 299:2413-2422. DOI:10.1001/jama.299.20.2413.
13. Hillenbrand A, Henne-Bruns D, Wolf AM. Panniculus, giant hernias and surgical problems in patients with morbid obesity. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2012;1: Doc05. DOI:10.3205/iprs000005.
14. Schillinger F, Schillinger D, Montagnac R, Milcent T. Post catheterisation vein stenosis in haemodialysis: comparative angiographic study of 50 subclavian and 50 internal jugular accesses. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1991;6(10):722-4. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/6.10.722.
15. Lacson E, Wang W, Lazarus JM, Hakim RM. Change in vascular access and hospitalization risk in long-term hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010; 5:1996-2003. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.08961209
16. Bradbury BD, Chen F, Furniss A, et al. Conversion of vascular access type among incident hemodialysis patients: Description and association with mortality. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 53:804-814. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.031
17. Lacson E Jr, Wang W, Lazarus JM, Hakim RM. Change in vascular access and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54:912-921 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.07.008
18. United States Renal Data System. 2016 USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2016.
19. Dolores Arenas M,Cazar R, Cordon A, at al at al. Is it possible to reach the catheter target proposed by the guidelines? Reasons for catheter use in prevalent hemodialysis patients. Nefrologia 2024;4 4(5):700-708 DOI:10.1016/j.nefro.2023.12.004.
20. Allon M, Daugirdas J, Depner TA, et al. Effect of change in vascular access on patient mortality in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47:469-477. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.11.023
21. Raimann JG, Barth C, Usvyat LA, et al. Dialysis access as an area of improvement in elderly incident hemodialysis patients: Results from a cohort study from the international monitoring dialysis outcomes initiative. Am J Nephrol. 2017; 45:486-496. DOI: 10.1159/000476003.
22. Hameeteman M, Bode AS, Peppelenbosch AG, et al. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement by surgical trainees: a safe procedure? Vasc Access. 2010;11(4):288-292. DOI: 10.5301/jva.2010.2372.
23. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(12):1123-1133. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra011883.
24. Kusminsky RE. Complications of central venous catheterization. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(4):681-696. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.039.
25. Lamperti M, Bodenham AR, Pittiruti M, et al. International evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound-guided vascular access. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(7):1105-1117. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-012-2597-x.
26. Bishop L, Dougherty L, Bodenham A, et al. Guidelines on the insertion and management of central venous access devices in adults. Int J Lab Hematol. 2007;29(4):261-278. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.00931.x.
27. McCann M, Moore ZEH. Interventions for preventing infectious complications in haemodialysis patients with central venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD006894. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006894.pub2.
28. Astor BC, Eustace JA, Powe NR, et ak. Study Type of vascular access and survival among incident hemodialysis patients: the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for ESRD (CHOICE) Study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(5):1449-1455. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2004090748.
Review
For citations:
Shakhov N.L., Trushkin R.N., Vtorenko V.I., Kotenko O.N., Frolova N.F., Bogodarov M.Yu., Kudryavtseva E.S., Tazetdinov D.Z., Kiselev A.S., Evdokimova A.A. New possibilities of tunnel catheter implantation for programmed hemodialysis in patients with limited vascular access. Nephrology and Dialysis. 2025;27(3):318-328. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2025-3-318-328