Preview

Nephrology and Dialysis

Advanced search

The experience in applying the contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in successfully operated patient with malignant tumor of kidney transplant. Case Study and Review of Literature

https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2021-3-414-424

Abstract

The risk of neoplasms development among kidney transplant (KT) recipients is twice higher than in the general population. The frequency of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) occurrence in KT recipients is about 0,6%. RCC more often develops in the native kidney than in KT (0,7% vs 0,2%). Several histopathological features in KT recipients were noted: reduced frequency of clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and wider distribution of papillary cell carcinoma in comparison with the general population. CCC is the most aggressive type of RCC in terms of metastasis and worst prognosis. The majority of KT tumors are asymptomatic and detected by accident. Presently, contrast-enhanced multispiral computed tomography (CEMCT) is considered to be the gold standard of noninvasive diagnostics of RCC. Since the 2000s, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has been actively implemented. This technique demonstrates results comparable to CEMCT. The article contains a brief overview of CEUS diagnostic capabilities in cases of RCC and highlights some technological and practical aspects of CEUS application in real clinical practice. The clinical case of diagnostics and successful surgical intervention in the patient with RCC and preserved KT function is presented. The perfusion pattern of rapid contrast media wash-in and wash-out during CEUS in a patient with histologically verified CCC was demonstrated. The patient underwent laparoscopic resection of the KT tumor. The diagnosis of CCC was finally verified by the results of histological examination. KT function was not affected during and after the surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this clinical case is the first description of CEUS application in a KT recipient with CCC in the Russian Federation. The presented data allows introduction the capabilities of CEUS as a diagnostic link in nephron-sparing strategy to a wide audience of clinicians.

About the Authors

N. I. Belavina
Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


R. N. Trushkin
Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


E. S. Ivanova
Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


L. U. Artyukhina
Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


A. E. Lubennikov
Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


D. F. Kantimerov
Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


O. V. Manchenko
Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


V. V. Varyasin
Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


E. S. Stolyarevich
Moscow City Hospital 52; A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry; Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Russian Federation


E. E. Berezhnaia
Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


I. K. Maksimov
Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


I. A. Kesareva
Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


V. N. Smorshchok
Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


N. F. Frolova
Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


N. N. Vetsheva
Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Russian Federation


References

1. Kaballo MA, Canney M, O’Kelly P et al. A comparative analysis of survival of patients on dialysis and after kidney transplantation. Clin. Kidney J. 2018;11:389-393. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx117.

2. Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Fraumeni JF Jr, Kasiske BL et al. Spectrum of cancer risk among US solid organ transplant recipients. JAMA. 2011 Nov 2;306(17):1891-901. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1592. PMID: 22045767; PMCID: PMC3310893.

3. Tessari G, Naldi L, Boschiero L et al. Incidence of primary and second cancers in renal transplant recipients: a multicenter cohort study. Am J Transplant. 2013 Jan;13(1):214-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04294.x. Epub 2012 Oct 11. PMID: 23057816.

4. Au E, Wong G, Chapman JR. Cancer in kidney transplant recipients. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 Aug;14(8):508-520. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0022-6. PMID: 29802400.

5. Penn I. Cancers in renal transplant recipients. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 2000 Apr;7(2):147-56. doi: 10.1053/rr.2000.5269. PMID: 10782732.

6. Warren H, Olsburgh J. Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Other Renal Masses in the Kidney Graft. Curr Urol Rep. 2020 Feb 11;21(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-0959-4. PMID: 32048068.

7. Griffith JJ, Amin KA, Waingankar N et al. Solid Renal Masses in Transplanted Allograft Kidneys: A Closer Look at the Epidemiology and Management. Am J Transplant. 2017 Nov;17(11):2775-2781. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14366. Epub 2017 Jun 27. PMID: 28544435.

8. Wong G, Turner RM, Chapman JR et al. Time on dialysis and cancer risk after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2013 Jan 15;95(1):114-21. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31827743b4. PMID: 23222892.

9. Ploussard G, Chambade D, Meria P, Gaudez F et al. Desgrandchamps F, Mongiat-Artus P. Biopsy-confirmed de novo renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in renal grafts: a single-centre management experience in a 2396 recipient cohort. BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(2):195-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10315.x. Epub 2011 Aug 2. PMID: 21810160.

10. Desai R, Collett D, Watson CJ et al. Cancer transmission from organ donors-unavoidable but low risk. Transplantation. 2012 Dec 27;94(12):1200-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318272df41. PMID: 23269448.

11. Diller R, Senninger N. Treatment options and outcome for renal cell tumors in the transplanted kidney. Int J Artif Organs. 2008 Oct;31(10):867-74. doi: 10.1177/039139880803101002. PMID: 19009504.

12. Chewcharat A, Thongprayoon C, Bathini T et al. Incidence and Mortality of Renal Cell Carcinoma after Kidney Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2019 Apr 17;8(4):530. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040530. PMID: 30999706; PMCID: PMC6517974.

13. Kompotiatis P, Thongprayoon C, Manohar S et al. Association between urologic malignancies and end-stage renal disease: A meta-analysis. Nephrology (Carlton). 2019 Jan;24(1):65-73. doi: 10.1111/nep.13209. PMID: 29236344.

14. Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA et al. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours. Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):93-105. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Feb 28. PMID: 26935559.

15. Tillou X, Doerfler A, Collon S et al. “Comité de Transplantation de l’Association Française d’Urologie (CTAFU)”. De novo kidney graft tumors: results from a multicentric retrospective national study. Am J Transplant. 2012 Dec;12(12):3308-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04248.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7. PMID: 22959020.

16. Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H et al. Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003 May;27(5):612-24. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200305000-00005. PMID: 12717246.

17. Tillou X, Guleryuz K, Doerfler A et al. members of the Renal Transplantation Committee of the French Urological Association (CTAFU). Nephron sparing surgery for De Novo kidney graft tumor: results from a multicenter national study. Am J Transplant. 2014 Sep;14(9):2120-5. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12788. Epub 2014 Jul 1. PMID: 24984974.

18. Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Cioffi V et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography with unenhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of malignancy in complex cystic renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Oct;191(4):1239-49. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3546. PMID: 18806171.

19. Vogel C, Ziegelmüller B, Ljungberg B et al. Imaging in Suspected Renal-Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Review. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Apr;17(2):e345-e355. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.07.024. Epub 2018 Aug 11. PMID: 30528378.

20. Harvey CJ, Alsafi A, Kuzmich S et al. Role of US Contrast Agents in the Assessment of Indeterminate Solid and Cystic Lesions in Native and Transplant Kidneys. Radiographics. 2015 Sep-Oct;35(5):1419-30. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140222. Epub 2015 Aug 14. PMID: 26273994.

21. Xiao D, Craig JC, Chapman JR et al. Donor cancer transmission in kidney transplantation: a systematic review. Am J Transplant. 2013 Oct;13(10):2645-52. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12430. Epub 2013 Aug 26. PMID: 24034231.

22. Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N et al. Kidney Cancer, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Jun;15(6):804-834. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0100. PMID: 28596261.

23. Motta G, Ferraresso M, Lamperti L et al. Treatment options for localised renal cell carcinoma of the transplanted kidney. World J Transplant. 2020 Jun 29;10(6):147-161. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i6.147. PMID: 32742948; PMCID: PMC7360528.

24. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update. Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):799-810. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Feb 23. PMID: 30803729.

25. Вторенко В.И., Трушкин Р.Н., Лубенников А.Е., Колесников Н.О. Лапараскопическая резекция трансплантированной почки по поводу почечно-клеточного рака Т1аN0M0 E Урология 2017(1): 71-75 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urol.2017.1.71-75

26. Базаев В.В. Прокопенко Е.И. Ватазин А.В. и соавт. Успешное лечение рака функционирующего почечного трансплантата. Нефрология и диализ 2015. 17(4): 459-466

27. Rousseau B, Guillemin A, Duvoux C et al. Optimal oncologic management and mTOR inhibitor introduction are safe and improve survival in kidney and liver allograft recipients with de novo carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2019 Feb 15;144(4):886-896. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31769. Epub 2018 Nov 20. PMID: 30155929.

28. Ультразвуковое исследование с применением контрастных препаратов. От простого к сложному / Под общ. ред. Н.А. Сенча. - М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2021. - 296с.: ил. ISBN 978-5-00030-862-2.

29. Bădulescu MR, Socaciu MA, Moisoiu T et al. Current status of imaging diagnosis in the transplanted kidney. A review of the literature with a special focus on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Med Pharm Rep. 2020 Apr;93(2):133-144. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1536. Epub 2020 Apr 22. PMID: 32478319; PMCID: PMC7243885.

30. Dietrich CF, Averkiou M, Nielsen MB et al. How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS). Ultrasound Int Open. 2018 Jan;4(1):E2-E15. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-123931. Epub 2018 Feb 7. PMID: 29423461; PMCID: PMC5802984.

31. Пятченков М.О., Румянцев А.Ш., Захаров М.В. и соавт. Безопасность магнитно-резонансных контрастных исследований у пациентов с нарушением выделительной функции почек. Нефрология и диализ. 2021 23(1): 19-31. DOI: 10.28996/2618-9801-2021-1-19-31

32. Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Gilja OH et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall Med. 2018 Apr;39(2):e2-e44. English. doi: 10.1055/a-0586-1107. Epub 2018 Mar 6. PMID: 29510439.

33. Allgood E, Raman SS. Image Interpretation: Practical Triage of Benign from Malignant Renal Masses. Radiol Clin North Am. 2020 Sep;58(5):875-884. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 15. PMID: 32792120.

34. Kazmierski BJ, Sharbidre KG, Robbin ML, Grant EG. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Renal Transplants. J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Dec;39(12):2457-2468. doi: 10.1002/jum.15339. Epub 2020 May 15. PMID: 32412688.

35. Xu ZF, Xu HX, Xie XY et al. Renal cell carcinoma: real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings. Abdom Imaging. 2010 Dec;35(6):750-6. doi: 10.1007/s00261-009-9583-y. PMID: 19844755.

36. Соловьев Я.А., Митина Л.А., Митькова М.Д. Ультразвуковое исследование с контрастным усилением в дифференциальной диагностике злокачественных и доброкачественных опухолей почек. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2018 (4): 46-64.

37. Lu Q, Xue LY, Huang BJ et al. Histotype differentiation of hypo-echoic renal tumors on CEUS: usefulness of enhancement homogeneity and intensity. Abdom Imaging. 2015 Aug;40(6):1675-83. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0340-5. PMID: 25549784.

38. Xue LY, Lu Q, Huang BJ et al. Differentiation of subtypes of renal cell carcinoma with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2016 Oct 5;63(4):361-371. doi: 10.3233/CH-152024. PMID: 26598999.


Review

For citations:


Belavina N.I., Trushkin R.N., Ivanova E.S., Artyukhina L.U., Lubennikov A.E., Kantimerov D.F., Manchenko O.V., Varyasin V.V., Stolyarevich E.S., Berezhnaia E.E., Maksimov I.K., Kesareva I.A., Smorshchok V.N., Frolova N.F., Vetsheva N.N. The experience in applying the contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in successfully operated patient with malignant tumor of kidney transplant. Case Study and Review of Literature. Nephrology and Dialysis. 2021;23(3):414-424. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2021-3-414-424

Views: 71


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1680-4422 (Print)
ISSN 2618-9801 (Online)