Preview

Nephrology and Dialysis

Advanced search

The features of platelet function and platelet morphology by using of anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic renal failure treated with hemodialysis

Abstract

We enrolled 25 patients at the end-stage of chronic renal failure of various origins, who were treated with program hemodialysis (PHD) in the Center of Dialysis and Transplantation at the M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow regional clinical and research institute. The main group consisted of 12 patients who were administered Fraxiparine («GlaxoSmithKline», United Kingdom), a low-molecular weight heparin for hypocoagulation during the procedure of hemodialysis. The drug was administered in a bolus dose prescribed individually into the arterial line after connecting it to a fistula needle. The control group (13 patients) received unfractionated heparin in conventional way (a bolus 2000 to 2500 IU before the beginning of the procedure, followed by 1200 to 1500 IU/h in a continuous infusion, stopped 1 hour prior to the end of dialysis). At the beginning and the end of the procedure the concentration of platelets was measured. Morphofunctional state of living platelets in situ we evaluated by the method of computer morphometry using computer phase-interference microscope (CPM) «Cytoscan» (Moscow, Russia). We analyzed the optical - geometrical parameters and the morphological features of living platelets which reflected the degree of their activation at the beginning of PHD (before administration of heparin), in 15 minutes after it and at the end of the procedure. After the hemodialysis we registered the certain changes of the morphological content and optical (geometrical) parameters of circulating platelets which changed in the different degree depending on prescribed anticoagulant therapy. The results allow us to conclude that the use of Fraxiparine provides better ratio of efficacy/safety and causes a reduction of the platelet activation during the hemodialysis procedure.

About the Authors

E. A. Vlasova
Russian State Medical University, Moscow
Russian Federation


I. A. Vasilenko
Russian State Medical University, Moscow
Russian Federation


A. V. Vatazin
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow regional clinical and research institute (MONIKI), Moscow
Russian Federation


V. P. Suslov
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow regional clinical and research institute (MONIKI), Moscow
Russian Federation


I. N. Pashkin
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow regional clinical and research institute (MONIKI), Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. Балуда В.П., Балуда М.В., Деянов И.И. и др. Физиология системы гемостаза. М., 1995.

2. Василенко И.А., Шабалин В.Н., Тычинский В.П. и др. Новая технология прижизненной компьютерной фазовой микроскопии: диагностические возможности и перспективы // Радиоэлектроника в медицинской диагностике (оценка функций и состояния организма). М., 1995. С. 164-169.

3. Петренко В.А. О государстве судят по отношению к инвалидам // Федеральный справочник «Здравоохранение России». 2010. № 11. С. 149-156.

4. Рудько И.А., Балашова Т.С., Кубатиев А.А. Состояние прооксидантно-антиоксидантной систем эритроцита у больных хронической почечной недостаточностью // Тер. архив. 1995. № 8. С. 7-9.

5. Сидоренко Б.А., Преображенский Д.В. Низкомолекулярные гепарины: возможности применения // Кардиология. 1995. № 10. С. 86-90.

6. Хасабов Н.Н., Шило В.Ю. Применение фраксипарина у больных на программном гемодиализе // Клиническая фармакология и терапия. 2006. Т. 15. № 1. С. 1-5.

7. Aggarwal A., Whitaker D.A., Rimmer J.M. et al. Attenuation of platelet reactivity by enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing haemodialysis // Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2004. Vol. 19. P. 1559-1563.

8. Anand S.X., Kim M.C., Kamran M. et al. Comparison of platelet function and morphology in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention receiving bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin versus clopidogrel pretreatment and bivalirudin // Am. J. Cardiol. 2007. Vol. 100. № 3. P. 417-424.

9. Beguin S., Mardiguian J., Lindhout T. et al. The mode of action of low molecular weight heparin preparation (PK 10169) and two of its major components on thrombin generation in plasma // Thromb. Haemost. 1989. Vol. 61. P. 30-34.

10. Borm J.J., Krediet R., Sturk A. et al. Heparin versus low molecular weight heparin K 2165 in chronic hemodialysis patients: a randomized cross-over study // Haemostasis. 1986. Vol. 16. Suppl. 2. P. 59-68.

11. Butchart E.G., Bodnar E. Trombosis, embolism and bliding // 1st Edition. London. ICR Publishers. 1992. P. 123-172.

12. Davi G., Patrono C. Platelet activation and atherothrombosis // N. Engl. J. Med. 2007. Vol. 357. № 24. P. 2482-2494.

13. El-Shahawy M., Noureddin M., Abdullah H. et al. Platelet FcgammaRIIA receptor surface expression is increased in patients with ESRD and is associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular events // Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2007. Vol. 49. № 1. P. 127-134.

14. Fuster V., Badimon L., Badimon J.J. et al. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (1) // N. Engl. J. Med. 1992. Vol. 326. № 4. P. 242-250.

15. Fuster V., Badimon L., Badimon J.J. et al. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (2) // N. Engl. J. Med. 1992. Vol. 326. № 5. P. 310-318.

16. Gritters M., Borgdorff P., Grooteman M. et al. Platelet activation in clinical haemodialysis: LMWH as a major contributor to bio-incompatibility? // Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2008. Vol. 23. № 9 P. 2911-2917.

17. Hasler C.R., Owen G.R., Brunner W. et al. Echinocytosis induced by haemodialysis // Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 1998. Vol. 13. № 12. P. 3132-3137.

18. Hirsh J., Levine M.N. Low molecular weight heparin // Blood. 1992. Vol. 79. P. 1-17.

19. Richtrova P., Rulcova K., Mares J. et al. Evaluation of three different methods to prevent dialyzer clotting without causing systemic anticoagulation effect // Artif. Organs. 2011. Vol. 35. № 1. P. 83-88.

20. Serra A., Esteve J., Reverter J.C. et al. Differential effect of a low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) and unfractionated heparin on platelet interaction with the subendothelium under flow conditions // Thrombosis Research. 1997. Vol. 87. Issue 4. P. 405-410.

21. Stefoni S., Cianciolo G., Donati G. et al. Standard heparin versus lowmolecular-weight heparin. A medium-term comparison in haemodialysis // Nephron. 2002. Vol. 92. P. 589-600.

22. Suzuki T., Ota K., Naganuma S. et al. Clinical application of Fragmin (FR-860) in hemodialysis: multicenter cooperative study in Japan // Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 1990. Vol. 16. P. 46-54.

23. Vermylen J.G. Effect of heparin and low molecular weight heparins on platelets. // Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 1993. Vol. 19. P. 20-21.

24. Xiao Z., The roux P. Platelet activation with unfractionated heparin at therapeutic concentrations and comparisons with a low-molecular-weight heparin and with a direct thrombin inhibitor // Circulation. 1998. Vol. 97. N 3. P. 251-256.


Review

For citations:


Vlasova E.A., Vasilenko I.A., Vatazin A.V., Suslov V.P., Pashkin I.N. The features of platelet function and platelet morphology by using of anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic renal failure treated with hemodialysis. Nephrology and Dialysis. 2014;16(1):139-144. (In Russ.)

Views: 35


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1680-4422 (Print)
ISSN 2618-9801 (Online)