Preview

Nephrology and Dialysis

Advanced search

The choice of the modality of the renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery based on the prognosis of poor outcome

Abstract

The aim. Identification of the criteria for choice of the modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Materials and methods. A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate some demographic and clinical parameters as the potential risk factors for poor outcome in patients with AKI requiring RRT (AKI-D) after cardiac surgery with CPB. Original severity score was developed and a criterion was made for choice of renal replacement therapy modality. Results. Developed score had the best discriminatory ability for death predicting in patients with AKI-D after cardiac surgery with CPB. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the score was 0,892 (95% CI 0,852 to 0,925). Its predictive accuracy was compared with other scores by area under the ROC curve. After applying the new score to the group of patients on intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) a defined criterion for the choice of RRT modality was developed. The value of the new score of 3,2 and below was found to be safe for the choice of intermittent hemodialysis modality. Conclusions. The new score is valid and accurate in predicting death for AKI-D after open-heart surgery. This score and value for the choice of RRT was made for guidance only, but in difficult situations, this score can facilitate the choice.

About the Authors

A. A. Malov
State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Russian Federation


T. V. Mukhoedova
State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Russian Federation


A. S. Borisov
State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Russian Federation


References

1. Bagshaw S.M., Berthiaume L.R., Delaney A., Bellomo R. Continuous versus intermittent renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis // Crit. Care Med. 2008. Vol. 36. P. 610-617.

2. Bellomo R. et al. Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group // Critical Care. 2004. Vol. 8. Р. 204-212.

3. Bouchard J., Soroko S.B., Chertow et al. Program to Improve Care in Acute Renal Disease (PICARD) Study Group. (2009). Fluid accumulation, survival and recovery of kidney function in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury // Kidney International 2009. Vol. 76. P. 422-427.

4. Bouchard J., Soroko S.B., Chertow G.M. et al. Fluid accumulation, survival and recovery of kidney function in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury // Kidney Int. 2009. Vol. 76. P. 422-427.

5. Demirjian S., Chertow G.M., Zhang J.H. et al. Model to predict mortality in critically ill adults with acute kidney injury // Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011. Vol. 6. P. 2114-2120.

6. Harrison D.A., Brady A.R., Parry G.J. et al. Recalibration of risk prediction models in a large multicenter cohort of admissions to adult, general critical care units in the United Kingdom // Crit. Care Med. 2006. Vol. 34. P. 1378-1388.

7. Knaus W.A., Draper E.A., Wagner D.P. et al. APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system // Crit. Care Med. 1985. Vol. 13. P. 818-829.

8. Knaus W.A., Draper E.A., Wagner D.P. et al. Prognosis in acute organ-system failure // Ann. Surg. 1985. Vol. 202. P. 685-693.

9. Levy M.M. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference // Crit. Care Med. 2003. Vol. 31. Р. 1250-1256.

10. Liano F., Gallego A., Pascual J. et al. Prognosis of acute tubular necrosis: An extended prospectively contrasted study // Nephron. 1993. Vol. 63. P. 21-31.

11. Marshall J.C., Cook D.J., Christou N.V. et al. Multiple organ dysfunction score: A reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome // Crit. Care Med. 1995. Vol. 23. P. 1638-1652.

12. Payen D., de Pont A.C., Sakr Y. et al. A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure // Critical Care. 2008. Vol. 12. R74.

13. Thakar C.V., Arrigain S., Worley S., Yared J.P., Paganini E.P. A clinical score to predict acute renal failure after cardiac surgery // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005. Vol. 16. P. 162-168.

14. Thakar C.V., Paganini E.P. Acute Renal Failure after Cardiac Surgery // Critical Care Nephrology / C. Ronco, R. Bellomo, J.A. Kellum eds. Saunders Elsevier, 2009. P. 977-983.

15. Rabindranath K., Adams J., Macleod A.M., Muirhead N. Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure in adults // Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2007. Vol. 3. CD003773.

16. Schneider A.G., Bellomo R., Bagshaw S.M. et al. Choice of renal replacement therapy modality and dialysis dependence after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Intensive Care Med. 2013. Vol. 39. P. 987-997.

17. Vanholder R., Van Biesen W., Hoste R., Lameire N. Pro/con debate: Continuous versus intermittent dialysis for acute kidney injury: a never-ending story yet approaching the finish? // Critical Care. 2011. Vol. 15. P. 204.

18. Vincent J.L., Moreno R., Takala J. et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. // Intensive Care Med. 1996. Vol. 22. P. 707-710.

19. Vincent J.L. The Critically Ill Patient: Severity Scores // Critical Care Nephrology / C. Ronco, R. Bellomo, J.A. Kellum eds. Saunders Elsevier, 2009. Р. 55-65.


Review

For citations:


Malov A.A., Mukhoedova T.V., Borisov A.S. The choice of the modality of the renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery based on the prognosis of poor outcome. Nephrology and Dialysis. 2014;16(1):155-161. (In Russ.)

Views: 33


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1680-4422 (Print)
ISSN 2618-9801 (Online)