Preview

Nephrology and Dialysis

Advanced search

Secondary thrombotic microangiopathy or secondary HUS: drugs or malignant hypertension to blame? Case report and review of the literature

https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2022-3-510-518

Abstract

Currently, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a common finding in the histological examination of kidney biopsy specimens, while verification of the nosological diagnosis is difficult due to the many etiological factors and the variety of clinical phenotypes. Today, along with primary TMAs, which include thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), a large group of secondary TMAs associated with a variety of diseases and conditions, considered secondary HUS, is attracting more and more attention. The article presents a clinical case of the development of thrombotic microangiopathy in a 48-year-old man with a history of intravenous drug user who suffered from severe arterial hypertension for a long time. A feature of the disease was clinically - the almost complete absence of hematological manifestations with a progressive nature of nephropathy with an outcome in end-stage kidney disease, morphologically - mainly chronic changes in small extraglomerular vessels (arteries and arterioles), which led to severe ischemic damage to the glomeruli. Considering the predominantly chronic nature of the morphological manifestations of TMA, the absence of signs of acute TMA, and hematological syndrome, the patient did not undergo plasma therapy. In connection with the development of end-stage kidney disease, hemodialysis was initiated. The presented observation illustrates the complex genesis of secondary TMA in a patient with a history of drug addiction and severe arterial hypertension approaching malignant downstream. The presence in the anamnesis of such complement-activating conditions as intravenous drug use, severe arterial hypertension, as well as vaccination against a new coronavirus infection preceding the clinical manifestation, allowed us to interpret this condition as secondary HUS, which, however, does not exclude the presence of protein gene mutations, regulators of the alternative pathway of complement activation, which could act as a predisposing factor, which requires a genetic study of the complement system, since the information obtained will determine the tactics of management in case of kidney transplantation. In addition, this clinical observation demonstrates the importance of a thorough history taking in such patients, the analysis of which will help to identify complement-activating conditions and thereby accelerate the verification of the diagnosis.

About the Authors

N. L. Kozlovskaya
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia; Eramishantsev City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


D. V. Starikov
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation


T. V. Bondarenko
Eramishantsev City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


O. A. Volkova
Eramishantsev City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


E. S. Stolyarevich
Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry; Moscow City Nephrology Center, Moscow City Hospital 52
Russian Federation


E. I. Krasnolutskaya
Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation


T. V. Smirnova
Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation


References

1. Brocklebank V., Wood K.M., Kavanagh D. Thrombotic Microangiopathy and the Kidney. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018; 13(2): 300-317. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00620117.

2. Praga M., Rodríguez de Córdoba S. Secondary atypical hemolytic uremic syndromes in the era of complement blockade. Kidney Int. 2019; 95(6): 1298-1300. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.01.043.

3. Olson S.R., Lu E., Sulpizio E. et al. TG. When to Stop Eculizumab in Complement-Mediated Thrombotic Microangiopathies. Am J Nephrol. 2018; 48(2): 96-107. doi: 10.1159/000492033.

4. Berger B.E. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a syndrome in need of clarity. Clin Kidney J. 2018; 12(3): 338-347. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfy066.

5. Gu X., Herrera G.A. Thrombotic microangiopathy in cocaine abuse-associated malignant hypertension: report of 2 cases with review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007; 131(12): 1817-20. doi: 10.5858/2007-131-1817-TMICAM.

6. Nataatmadja M., Divi D. Relapsing thrombotic microangiopathy and intravenous sustained-release oxycodone. Clin Kidney J. 2016; 9(4): 580-2. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw039.

7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). “Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP)-like illness associated with intravenous Opana ER abuse--Tennessee, 2012.” MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report vol. 62,1 (2013): 1-4.

8. Ambruzs J.M., Serrell P.B., Rahim N. et al. Thrombotic microangiopathy and acute kidney injury associated with intravenous abuse of an oral extended-release formulation of oxymorphone hydrochloride: kidney biopsy findings and report of 3 cases. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014; 63(6): 1022-6. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.01.015.

9. Sethi S. The Changing Spectrum of Heroin-Associated Kidney Disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018; 13(7): 975-976. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06080518.

10. Tacker D.H., Okorodudu A.O. Evidence for injurious effect of cocaethylene in human microvascular endothelial cells. Clin Chim Acta. 2004; 345(1-2): 69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.02.031.

11. Kolodgie F.D., Wilson P.S., Mergner W.J. et al. Cocaine-induced increase in the permeability function of human vascular endothelial cell monolayers. Exp Mol Pathol. 1999; 66(2): 109-22. doi: 10.1006/exmp.1999.2253.

12. Robson K.J., Clucas D., Filshie R. et al. Thrombotic microangiopathy associated with intravenous injection of extended-release oxycodone. BMJ Case Rep. 2017; 2017: bcr2017220977. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-220977.

13. Tsai H.M. A mechanistic approach to the diagnosis and management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Transfus Med Rev. 2014; 28(4): 187-97. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.08.004.

14. De Serres S.A., Isenring P. Athrombocytopenic thrombotic microangiopathy, a condition that could be overlooked based on current diagnostic criteria. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009; 24(3): 1048-50. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn687.

15. Козловская Н.Л., Демьянова К.А., Кузнецов Д.В. и соавт. Субклиническая тромботическая микроангиопатия при атипичном гемолитико-уремическом синдроме: единичный случай или закономерность? Нефрология и диализ. 2014; 16(2): 280-287.

16. van den Born B.J., Honnebier U.P., Koopmans R.P. et al. Microangiopathic hemolysis and renal failure in malignant hypertension. Hypertension. 2005; 45(2): 246-51. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000151620.17905.ee.

17. Akimoto T., Muto S., Ito C. et al. Clinical features of malignant hypertension with thrombotic microangiopathy. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2011; 33(2): 77-83. doi: 10.3109/10641963.2010.503303.

18. Козловская Н. Л., Акаева М.И., Столяревич Е.С. и др. Тромботическая микроангиопатия, ассоциированная со злокачественной артериальной гипертензией. Клиническая нефрология. 2017; 1: 49-56.

19. Шелудченко В.М., Козловская Н.Л., Смирнова Т.В. и др. Офтальмологические аспекты сосудистых и функциональных изменений при злокачественной артериальной гипертонии почечного генеза. Вестник офтальмологии. 2020; 136(4-2): 324-332. doi: 10.17116/oftalma2020136042324.

20. Ruggenenti P., Remuzzi G. Malignant vascular disease of the kidney: nature of the lesions, mediators of disease progression, and the case for bilateral nephrectomy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996; 27(4): 459-75. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90155-9.

21. Shibagaki Y., Fujita T. Thrombotic microangiopathy in malignant hypertension and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS)/ thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP): can we differentiate one from the other? Hypertens Res. 2005; 28(1): 89-95. doi: 10.1291/hypres.28.89.

22. Vaughan C.J., Delanty N. Hypertensive emergencies. Lancet. 2000; 356(9227): 411-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02539-3.

23. Mathew R.O., Nayer A., Asif A. The endothelium as the common denominator in malignant hypertension and thrombotic microangiopathy. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016; 10(4): 352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2015.12.007.

24. Tiede A., Sachs U.J., Czwalinna A. et al. Prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia after COVID-19 vaccination. Blood. 2021; 138(4): 350-353. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021011958.

25. De Fabritiis M., Angelini M.L., Fabbrizio B. et al. Renal Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Concurrent COVID-19 Vaccination and Infection. Pathogens. 2021; 10(8): 1045. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10081045.

26. Tanaka F., Katayama K., Joh K. et al. Minimal change disease with thrombotic microangiopathy following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Clin Kidney J. 2021; 15(3): 567-568. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab234.

27. Jokiranta T.S. HUS and atypical HUS. Blood. 2017; 129(21): 2847-2856. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-11-709865.

28. Aigner C., Schmidt A., Gaggl M. et al. An updated classification of thrombotic microangiopathies and treatment of complement gene variant-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy. Clin Kidney J. 2019; 12(3): 333-337. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfz040.


Review

For citations:


Kozlovskaya N.L., Starikov D.V., Bondarenko T.V., Volkova O.A., Stolyarevich E.S., Krasnolutskaya E.I., Smirnova T.V. Secondary thrombotic microangiopathy or secondary HUS: drugs or malignant hypertension to blame? Case report and review of the literature. Nephrology and Dialysis. 2022;24(3):510-518. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2022-3-510-518

Views: 63


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1680-4422 (Print)
ISSN 2618-9801 (Online)