Preview

Nephrology and Dialysis

Advanced search

Presentation and outcomes of anti-GBM disease: a case series

https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2024-2-131-139

Abstract

Aim: to describe the clinical course and outcomes of the anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease. Methods: in this case series we included patients with anti-GBM disease from different regions of the country. The diagnosis was established based on the clinical and laboratory features (rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH), anti-GBM antibodies levels exceeding the reference range of the local lab) and/or morphological evaluation (extracapillary glomerulonephritis (ECGN) type I) according to the Chapel Hill 2012 consensus conference definition. Results: We enrolled six cases of anti-GBM disease, one male (24 y.o.) and five females (from 27 to 67 y.o.), who were diagnosed between 2016 and 2023. Among them, five had kidney involvement requiring kidney replacement therapy at the disease onset. Four patients had lung involvement, among them two required invasive ventilation due to DAH at the onset. Kidney biopsy was performed in two cases and showed ECGN type I with 100% crescents in both. All patients received glucocorticoids at an initial dose of 50-60 mg q.d. (prednisolone equivalent), five received cyclophosphamide (four of them oral), and four received plasma exchanges. It should be noted that the treatment regimen was in complete compliance with current guidelines only in two cases. Severe adverse events occurred in five patients, leukopenia and infections being the most common. All patients survived and achieved complete remission. Among five patients with kidney involvement four developed chronic kidney disease stage 5 and continued receiving kidney replacement therapy. Conclusion: management of anti-GBM disease presents a challenge in the real-world practice. Kidney survival remains unsatisfactory.

About the Authors

N. M. Bulanov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation


A. A. Alekseev
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation


S. A. Konchina
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation


S. J. Peng
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation


M. L. Bulanova
Vladimir Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


S. V. Moiseev
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation


References

1. Jennette J.C., Falk R.J., Bacon P.A. et al. 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum. 2013. 65(1):1-11. doi: 10.1002/art.37715

2. Marques C., Carvelli J., Biard L. et al. Prognostic Factors in Anti-glomerular Basement Membrane Disease: A Multicenter Study of 119 Patients. Front Immunol. 2019. 10:1665. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01665

3. Canney M., O’Hara P.V., McEvoy C.M. et al. Spatial and Temporal Clustering of Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016. 11(8):1392-1399. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13591215

4. Jennette J.C. Rapidly progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 2003. 63(3):1164-1177. doi10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00843.x

5. Donaghy M., Rees A.J. Cigarette smoking and lung haemorrhage in glomerulonephritis caused by autoantibodies to glomerular basement membrane. Lancet. 1983. 2(8364):1390-1393. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90923-6

6. Bombassei G.J., Kaplan A.A. The association between hydrocarbon exposure and anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody-mediated disease (Goodpasture’s syndrome). Am J Ind Med. 1992. 21(2):141-153. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700210204

7. Clatworthy M.R., Wallin E.F., Jayne D.R. Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Disease after Alemtuzumab. N Engl J Med. 2008. 359(7):768-769. doi:10.1056/NEJMc0800484

8. Rovin B.H., Adler S.G., Barratt J. et al. KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases. Kidney Int. 2021. 100(4):S1-S276. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021

9. Бобкова И.Н., Ватазин А.В., Ветчинникова О.Н. и соавт. Клинические рекомендации. Хроническая болезнь почек. Ассоциация нефрологов России. Режим доступа: https://rusnephrology.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/kr469.pdf. Ссылка активна на 26.03.2024.

10. Stevens P.E., Ahmed S.B., Carrero J.J. et al. KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2024. 105(4):S117-S314. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018

11. Буланова М.Л., Потапов Д.В., Буланов Н.М. и соавт. Атипичное течение болезни Гудпасчера: клиническое наблюдение и обзор литературы. Терапевтический архив. 2018;90(6):130-136.

12. Gagnier J.J., Kienle G., Altman D.G. et al. The CARE guidelines: Consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. BMJ Case Rep. 2013. 2(5):38-43. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-201554

13. Hirayama K., Yamagata K., Kobayashi M. et al. Anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody disease in Japan: part of the nationwide rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis survey in Japan. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2008. 12(5):339-347. doi: 10.1007/s10157-008-0051-8

14. Glassock R.J. Atypical anti-glomerular basement membrane disease: lessons learned. Clin Kidney J. 2016. 9(5):653-656. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw068

15. Shiroshita A., Oda Y., Takenouchi S. et al. Accuracy of Anti-GBM Antibodies in Diagnosing Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Nephrol. 2021. 52(7):531-538. doi: 10.1159/000518362

16. Zhu M., Wang J., Le W. et al. Relationship between anti-GBM antibodies and kidney outcomes in patients with anti-GBM disease. J Nephrol. 2023. 36(3):789-797. doi: 10.1007/S40620-022-01508-5

17. Philip R., Dumont A., Silva N.M. et al. ANCA and anti-glomerular basement membrane double-positive patients: A systematic review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev. 2021. 20(9):102885. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102885

18. Levy J.B., Turner A.N., Rees A.J. et al. Long-term outcome of anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody disease treated with plasma exchange and immunosuppression. Ann Intern Med. 2001. 134(11):1033-1042. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-11-200106050-00009

19. Johnson J.P., Moore J., Austin H.A. et al. Therapy of anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody disease: Analysis of prognostic significance of clinical, pathologic and treatment factors. Medicine (United States). 1985. 64(4):219-227. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198507000-00003

20. Jia X.Y., Xu H.Y., Jia X.Y. et al. Predictors of Kidney Outcomes of Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Disease in a Large Chinese Cohort. Am J Nephrol. 2022. 53(5):397-406. doi: 10.1159/000523713

21. Uhlin F., Szpirt W., Kronbichler A. et al. Endopeptidase Cleavage of Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Antibodies in vivo in Severe Kidney Disease: An Open-Label Phase 2a Study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022. 33(4):829-838. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021111460

22. Борисов А.Г., Чернов С.А., Потехин Н.П. Анти-БМК-ассоциированный гломерулонефрит (синдром Гудпасчера): опыт одного центра. Нефрология. 2019;23(приложение 1):61-62.

23. Буланов Н.М., Блюсс О.Б., Мунблит Д.Б. и соавт. Дизайн научных исследований в медицине. Сеченовский вестник. 2021. 12(1):4-17.


Review

For citations:


Bulanov N.M., Alekseev A.A., Konchina S.A., Peng S.J., Bulanova M.L., Moiseev S.V. Presentation and outcomes of anti-GBM disease: a case series. Nephrology and Dialysis. 2024;26(2):131-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2024-2-131-139

Views: 256


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1680-4422 (Print)
ISSN 2618-9801 (Online)