Preview

Nephrology and Dialysis

Advanced search

Partial recovery of kidney function in a case of delayed use of eculizumab in a patient with atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome

https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2021-3-425-433

Abstract

Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome (aHUS) belongs to a group of thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) characterized by profound injury to almost all organs and systems in the absence of specific treatment. Timely diagnosis and early initiation of complement-inhibiting therapy largely define the prognosis. In the presented case, aHUS was diagnosed in a 29-old female patient three weeks after the debut. The disease manifested in the context of diarrhea and resulted in progressive renal failure eventually requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). Laboratory findings characteristic of TMA (hemolytic Coombs-negative anemia with schizocytosis, thrombocytopenia and high serum LDH) did not reach the diagnostic criteria thus the renal biopsy was required and performed. Biopsy morphology came consistent with TMA. Additional examination ruled out some secondary forms of TMA and thrombotic-thrombocytopenic purpura. At that point, aHUS diagnosis was beyond doubt. Therapeutic plasma exchange was initiated and sustained for the induction and maintenance of remission before eculizumab administration, while the patient still required dialysis. The patient also received combined antihypertensive therapy and low-molecular-weight heparin. The plasma exchange course was complicated by life-threatening allergic reactions to FFP, requiring administration of high-dose glucocorticoids. Attempts at plasma exchange cessation resulted in aHUS relapse with extrarenal symptoms - convulsions with consistent ischemic lesions in the brain structures. Plasma exchange resumption resulted in remission shortly after initiation, including resolution of ischemic brain lesions. PE dependence resulted in 8-month hospital stay, with 55 plasma exchange therapies performed. The opportunity to begin the targeted therapy presented only 13 months after the disease debut. From the time of eculizumab initiation, no relapses were registered. Renal function recovery was noted as a significant therapy achievement, allowing withdrawing the patient from dialysis, which was required for 2.5 years. RRT was terminated 15 months after eculizumab initiation. The presented case confirms the efficacy of eculizumab therapy even in the event of delayed administration.

About the Authors

V. O. Popova
Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


E. V. Galkina
Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


T. A. Telegina
Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


A. V. Mezhin
Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


Y. L. Manakova
Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


N. L. Tov
Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital; Novosibirsk state medical University
Russian Federation


E. A. Movchan
Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital; Novosibirsk state medical University
Russian Federation


References

1. Campistol JM, Arias M, Ariceta G, Blasco M, Espinosa L, Espinosa M, et al. An update for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome: Diagnosis and treatment. A consensus documents. Nefrologia. 2015;35(5):421-447. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2015.07.005; Noris M, Remuzzi G. Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1676-1687 doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0902814.

2. Гудшип ТГ, Кук ГТ, Фахури Ф, Фервенца ФК и др. Атипичный гемолитико-уремический синдром и С3-гломерулопатия: итоги конференции «Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes» (KDIGO) по спорным вопросам. Нефрология 2018;22(4):18-39 https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2018-22-4-18-39.

3. Клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению атипичного гемолитико-уремического синдрома. Нефрология и диализ 2015 Т. 17, № 3: 242-264.

4. Constantinescu AR, Bitzan M, Weiss LS, Christen E, Kaplan BS, Cnaan A et al. Non-enteropathic hemolytic uremic syndrome: causes and short-term course. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004; 43: 976-982. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.02.010

5. Nester CM, Barbour T, de Cordoba SR, Dragon-Durey MA, Fremeaux-Bacchi V. et al. Atypical aHUS: state of the art. Mol Immunol 2015. 67:31-42 doi: 10.1016/j.molimm; Fakhouri F, Zuber J, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, Loirat C Haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Lancet 2017 390:681-696. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30062-4.

6. Резолюция экспертного совета по оптимизации подходов к терапии атипичного гемолитико-уремического синдрома по итогам заседания 18 апреля 2014 года, г. Москва. Нефрология и диализ. 2014. 16(2): 304-306.

7. Ariceta G. Optimal duration of treatment with eculizumab in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS)-a question to be addressed in a scientific way Pediatric Nephrology (2019) 34:943-949 doi.org/10.1007/s00467-019-4192-7.

8. Loirat C, Frémeaux-Bacchi V. Atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2011; 6: 60 doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-60; Sridharan M, Go RS, Willrich MAV Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: Review of clinical presentation, diagnosis and management J Immunol Methods. 2018; 461:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.07.006.

9. Laurence J., Haller H., Mannucci P. M., Nangaku M., Praga M., de Cordoba S. R. Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS): Essential Aspects of an Accurate Diagnosis Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology 2019, Volume 1, Issue 11, Supplement 11.

10. Waters AM, Licht C. aHUS caused by complement dysregulation: new therapies on the horizon. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011;26(1):41-57 doi: 10.1007/s00467-010-1556-4.

11. Noris M, Caprioli J, Bresin E, et al. Relative role of genetic complement abnormalities in sporadic and familial aHUS and their impact on clinical phenotype. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(10):1844-1859: doi: 10.2215/CJN.02210310.

12. Ebrahem R, Kadhem S, Truong Q. Treatment of Atypical Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome in the Era of Eculizumab. Cureus. 2017 23;9(3): e1111. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1111.

13. Raina R, Krishnappa V. Blaha T., Kann T., Hein W., Burke L., Bagga A. Atypical Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome: An Update on Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Review. Ther Apher Dial. 2019Vol. 23, No. 1: 4-21.

14. Jamme M, Raimbourg Q, Chauveau D, Seguin A, Presne C, Perez P, et al. Predictive features of chronic kidney disease in atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome. PLoS One 2017;12(5):e0177894. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0177894

15. Walle, J.V., Delmas, Y., Ardissino, G. et al. Improved renal recovery in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome following rapid initiation of eculizumab treatment. J Nephrol 30, 127-134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-016-0288-3.

16. Козловская Н.Л., Демьянова К.А., Кузнецов Д.В., Кучиева А.М., Боброва Л.А., Столяревич Е.С. Субклиническая» тромботическая микроангиопатия при атипичном гемолитико-уремическом синдроме: единичный случай или закономерность? Нефрология и диализ. 2014;16 (2):280-287.

17. Emirova K, Volokhina E, Tolstova E, van den Heuvel B. Recovery of renal function after long-term dialysis and resolution of cardiomyopathy in a patient with aHUS receiving eculizumab. BMJ Case Rep. 2016 Feb 15; doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-213928.

18. Alonso Valente R., García Rodríguez GE, García Marcote Y., Fidalgo Díaz M., Becerra Mosquera V., Novoa García D., Cordal Martínez T., Díaz Rodríguez C. Discontinuation of Peritoneal Dialysis after Late Initiation of Eculizumab in a Case of Familial Atypical Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome: A Case Report Case Rep Nephrol Dial 2017;7:18-25//doi.org/10.1159/000457950.


Review

For citations:


Popova V.O., Galkina E.V., Telegina T.A., Mezhin A.V., Manakova Y.L., Tov N.L., Movchan E.A. Partial recovery of kidney function in a case of delayed use of eculizumab in a patient with atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Nephrology and Dialysis. 2021;23(3):425-433. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2021-3-425-433

Views: 94


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1680-4422 (Print)
ISSN 2618-9801 (Online)